SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57489

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Smt. Jyothi Porika – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.4263 of 2020

ORDER:

This petition is filed by the petitioner, who was arrayed as Accused no.1, questioning the Remand Order dated 01.09.2020, passed by the Prl.Spl.Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in Crime No.03/ACB-WRL/2020.

2. The impugned remand order dated 01.09.2020 reads as follows:

“A.O.1 and A.O.2 are produced before me at 3:30 p.m. through PC.1128, WPC.2441, HG 1257 of ACB , Warangal. Before the production of accused by ACB, M/s.Vankina, Advocate & Partners advocates filed their memo of appearance for AO.1 and informed me through the bench clerk that they will file written arguments and they want to oppose the remand of AO.1. They sent soft copy of written arguments to the official E-Mail. In view of the said objection Special P.P was informed to get ready to submit her arguments. I have heard the learned counsel for AO.1 Sri Midhun Kumar for AO.1 and Smt.Manogna, Special P.P through video call. Sri Midhun Kumar opposed the remand of AO.1 on various grounds. He has submitted that AO.1 who is working as DCTO with good salary and who is due for promotion never demanded any bribe as alleged in the Rem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top