SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57535

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Islavath Saida – Appellant
Versus
Chebrolu Rama Rao and 2 Others – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

JUDGMENT:

Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Court of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- III Additional District Judge, F.T.C.II, Khammam (hereinafter referred as ‘the Tribunal’) in O.P.No.765 of 2003, dated 06.12.2007, the petitioner/injured in the said O.P. preferred the present Appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter be referred as they were arrayed before the learned Tribunal. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/ injured filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor accident that occurred on 28.04.2002. R-1 is the driver of the vehicle, R-2 is the owner of the lorry bearing No. AIL 2850 and R-3 is the insurer of the said lorry and the petitioner is the cleaner of the said vehicle. It is stated by the petitioner that on 28.04.2002, as per the directions of R-1, he was discharging duties under the subject lorry for setting wires when R-1 suddenly moved the lorry in a rash and negligent manner without taking any precautionary measures. As a result

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top