SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57545

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
Karri Gangu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Rajula Krishnaiah – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY Civil Revision Petition No.4125 of 2024

ORDER :

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 10.12.2024 passed in I.A.No.724 of 2024 in O.S.No.25 of 2018 by the Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at Shadnagar (for short ‘the impugned order’).

2. Heard Mr.S.Ram Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Ramachandra, learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the material available on record.

3. Vide the impugned order, the trial court has allowed the I.A. filed by the defendant Nos.3 to 5 under Order VIII Rule 1A (3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (for short ‘C.P.C’).

4. Vide the impugned order, the trial court has granted leave to the petitioners to receive documents mentioned in the said I.A.

5. It is relevant at this juncture to mention the fact that the suit filed by the plaintiff respondent in this case is a suit for declaration. The defendant Nos.3 to 5 upon notice entered appearance and filed their written statements, however, along with the written statement or at later stage, they did not filed certain documents in supp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top