SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57581

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
K. Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
P. Satyanarayana (died) per LRs R-4 to 8 – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA In/and

COMMON JUDGMENT:

Challenging the judgment and decree dated 17.09.2003 passed in O.S.No.21 of 1996 by the learned II Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, the present Appeal Suit is filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that O.S.No.21 of 1996 is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 03.07.1993, along with the recovery of possession of the plaint schedule house. As per the plaintiff, defendant No.1 entered into a sale agreement with him for a consideration of Rs.2,10,000/-, out of which Rs.1,10,000/- was paid as part consideration. The remaining Rs.1,00,000/- was to be paid by 03.04.1994, upon which the sale deed was to be executed. The plaintiff alleges that despite being ready and willing to perform their obligations under the contract and offering the balance amount, defendant No.1 failed to execute the sale deed. Instead, defendant No.1 proceeded to sell the property to defendant No.2. Defendant No.2, however, denies the claim of the plaintiff and asserts that they had an earlier agreement of sale with defendant No.1 dated 27.03.1993, pursuant to which possession of the prope

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top