HON’BLE MRS JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.25605 OF 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri R.Prabhakar, party-in-person/ petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-V, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“...Under these circumstances, it is just and necessary in the interest of justice that this Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus declaring the entire action of the respondents particularly the entire action of the 1^st respondent in rejecting the request of the petitioner and treating the suspension period as on duty under FR-54(B)(3) and in issuing the present impugned Memo No. 2238/SCD.Vig /2021 dt. 15-03-2022, wherein treating the suspension period not on duty by quoting FR-54(B) (7), instead of treating the suspension period as on duty under FR 54-B(3), despite of clean acquittal/discharge from the criminal proceedings initiated in CC No. 61 of 2015 in Crime No 15/ACB-WRL/2012 in Crl.RC.No.29/2020 dt. 18-05-2020 of this Hon’ble Court on considering the material on record, this court is of the view that no prima facie