SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57802

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
M/s. Lumbini Constructions Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Asst.Director Of Mines AND Geology – Respondent
WP 12737/2008



THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology.

2. This Writ Petition is filed to declare the demand notice dated 22.05.2008 issued by 1st respondent as illegal.

3. In the impugned demand notice dated 22.05.2008, there is a reference to show cause notice bearing No.6011/VG/2007 dated 13.10.2007 issued by 1st respondent. It is the specific case of petitioner that 1st respondent did not serve the said show cause notice on it. Thus, there is violation of principles of natural justice while issuing the impugned demand notice dated 22.05.2008 by 1st respondent.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology would contend that 1st respondent has issued show cause notice dated 13.10.2007 basing on the report dated 18.09.2007 of Regional Vigilance & Enforcement Officer, Hyderabad, and a copy of the same was furnished to petitioner and petitioner has submitted explanation. However, he fairly admits that 1st respondent has not served the show cause notice dated 13.10.2007, on the petitioner.

5. In the light of the said submissions, the impugned demand notice dated 22.05.2008 was issued by 1st respondent without serving show cause notice dated 13.10.2007 and the report dated 18.09.2007 on petitioner calling for explanation from petitioner. Therefore, the same is in violation of principles of natural justice.

6. Vide order dated 19.06.2008, this Court directed respondents not to take any coercive steps against petitioner pursuant to the impugned demand notice dated 22.05.2008 for a period of one week. Further, vide order dated 28.09.2018, this Court directed petitioner to file additional affidavit. It has filed additional affidavit.

7. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, without going into the merits or demerits of the case, only on the aforesaid ground, the impugned demand notice dated 22.05.2008 is set aside. Liberty is granted to 1st respondent to initiate fresh action and complete the same strictly in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Petitioner shall cooperate with 1st respondent in concluding the enquiry. Petitioner and 1st respondent shall not claim limitation with regard to initiation of fresh action and also issuance of fresh demand notice, if any.

8. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_________________

K. LAKSHMAN, J

2nd APRIL, 2025.

Note: issue c.c. in three (3) days.

kvni

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top