SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57807

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Pothula Nagaraju – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER:

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) by the petitioner/Accused to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.1203/2018 pending on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, at L.B.Nagar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent – State. Perused the record.

3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to dispense with the attendance of the petitioner.

4. In view of the said representation of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the attendance of the petitioner/accused is dispensed with in C.C.No.1203/2018 pending on the file of III Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, when represented by their counsel on record. The attendance of the petitioner is dispensed subject to filing an affidavit by the petitioner stating that in his absence the proceedings conducted by his counsel will not be disputed by him in any manner and also he shall not dispute his identity. However, the petitioner shall appear before the learned Magistrate as and when his presence is required. In the event of the petitioner’s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top