SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57853

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Gosukonda Pruthviraju – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.8224 of 2025

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents, and perused the record. With the consent of the counsel appearing for the respective parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that despite the 2nd respondent giving necessary instructions to add other culprits and also the relevant section of law in the FIR No.756/2024 dated 18-12-2024, the 3rd respondent is not taking any action thereon in spite of the petitioner’s written complaint dated 07-02-2025 followed by personal visits to respondent authorities, which action of the respondent authorities, it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional.

3. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the course of investigation into Cr.No.756/2024 or that the provisions under which the accused has been charged with, the petitioner can approach the concerned Magistrate and submit a petition seeking further investiga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top