SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57860

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Gutthi Satish Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.9879 of 2025

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.Aniketh Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the 3rd respondent authority is calling the petitioner to the police station at the behest of the 4th respondent and demanding to settle the case which has been registered, vide Crime No.233 of 2025 dt.19.02.2025, without issuing any notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS, which action of the respondents-authorities, it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

3. Per contra, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that the aforesaid crime has been registered on being referred by the Court of IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-Malkajgiri District at L.B.Nagar, in a private complaint made by the 4th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top