HON’BLE MRS JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.38583 of 2022

ORDER:

Heard C.Rajashekar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and T.Srujan Kumar Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

PERUSED THE RECORD

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking the prayer as follows:

“......to issue an appropriate Writ, Order of direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and to declare the action of the Respondents is not extending the benefit i.e., the difference of Gratuity on the revised pay scales and Encashment of Leave, the period between i.e., 01/11/2002 to 31/03/2006 on par with the existing employees of the District Cooperative Central Banks in the State as per the award i.e., Memorandum of Settlement dated 07/07/2008 to that effect the Circular dated 14/08/2010 which was issued by the respondents on the same the 70 Percent of respondents banks were implemented, wherein, the petitioners association Banks were not implemented is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and discriminatory and also inviolation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Banks to pay t