SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 57866

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
K. Sarveswar Rao and 18 others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and another – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.20682 of 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri Jurispath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I , appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the remuneration for 12 months to the part time Junior Lecturers (Vocational) working in Government Junior colleges on par with contract Lecturers, by implementing the G.O.Rt.No.95 dated 25.06.2019 is arbitrary, irrational and contrary to the principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Consequently, direct the respondents to implement the G.O.Rt.No.95 dated 25.06.2019 by paying the arrears from the date of issuance of the G.O.Rt.No.95 dated 25.06.2019 for 3 years dues to the petitioners and pay regularly 12 months of salary for each academic year, in the interest of justice.”

3. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the petitioners are working as Part-time Junior Lecturers (Vocational)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top