SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 58017

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Allampati Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 9701 of 2025

O R D E R

Heard Ms Priya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned Counsel for the petitioner on record, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondent Nos.1 to 5, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent No.6 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that though he is arrayed as accused No.3 in Cr.No.149 of 2025, dt.20.03.2025, registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by the 6th respondent herein, the respondents-authorities are not following the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of BNSS by issuing notice to the petitioner, and thus, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents-authorities to follow the procedure prescribed under BNSS.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for offic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top