SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 58171

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
Nandini Jalan – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Jalan – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE P.SAM KOSHY CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.232 of 2025

ORDER

(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

The instant Revision has been filed by the petitioner herein challenging the order dated 22.10.2024, in I.A.No.1351 of 2023 in FCOP.No.381 of 2020, passed by the Judge, Family Court, R.R.

District at L.B. Nagar.

2. Heard Ms. Manjari S. Ganu, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Shyam S. Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. Vide the impugned order; the Family Court has rejected a petition filed by the petitioner (wife) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying the Court to condone the delay of 874 days in filing the petition under Order IX Rule 10 of CPC for setting aside the ex parte decree that was passed in favour of the husband on

12.04.2021.

4. The facts which led to filing of the instant Revision are as under:-

a) The petitioner and respondent herein are husband and wife.

Henceforth, for convenience, the parties to the proceedings are referred to as husband and wife.

b) There are two petitions which have been filed by the husband before the Family Court, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar.

c) One is registered as FCOP.No.381 of 2020 seeking f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top