HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.42 OF 2026 DATE: 08.01.2026 Between Vallabhaneni Anil Kumar …appellant And

1.Dr.Kasturi Srinivas and four others.

... respondents Sri M.Pratheek Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

Sri Y.Srinivasa Murthy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mrs.Uma Devi Nama, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1.

Sri Bharath Kumar, the learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation for the respondent Nos.2 to 4. JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

appellant/respondent No.5 and learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/writ petitioner, we are of the view that the direction given by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 30 of the impugned common order dated 19.12.2025 cannot amount to any serious prejudice to the appellant since the three writ petitions were disposed of by directing the respondent No.3/the Registrar Cooperative Societies for the State of Telangana herein to consider the representations made by the respondent No.1/writ petitioner in W.P.No.34351 of 2025 against the impugned resolution under section 23 of The Telangana Co-operative Societies Act,1964 (‘1964 Act’) and also to issue a notice under Rule 20 of the Telangana Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 (‘1964 Rules’) before taking a decision thereunder.

appellant/respondent No.5 submits that direction (ii) in paragraph No.30 of the impugned order contains an error regarding the applicable provision, viz., ‘Rule 20 of the TCS Rules’. According to learned counsel, Rule 20 would not have any application to the facts of the case.

3. We do not find this ground to be sufficient for setting aside the impugned common order dated

19.12.2025 which is a reasoned order.

4. We hence give liberty to the appellant to place the correct provision, as is their contention, before the respondent No.3/Registrar. No further interference is called for.

5. W.A.No.42 of 2026, along with all connected applications, is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J

GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, J

Date:08.01.2026

EDS