IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.745 OF 2026 THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX Between:

Deekonda Kishan @ Deekonda Pratap … Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperative Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and (2) others.

… Respondents

ORDER :

With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

“to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the then President of 3rd respondent society in passing the suspension order based on the allegations made in the resolution dated 14.02.2022 of the Managing Committee but without framing any charges and without conducting disciplinary enquiry on the said allegations and even after completion of three months without reviewing the suspension order and without paying subsistence allowance is arbitrary, illegal and accordingly set aside the suspension order dated 26.02.2022 passed by the then President of the 3^rd Respondent Society and consequently direct the 3^rd respondent to reinstate the Petitioner into service in the post of Chief Executive Officer by reviewing the suspension order dated 26.02.2022 passed by the then President of the 3rd respondent society as per the orders made in GO.Ms.No.86 General Administration Services-C Department dated 8.3.1994 by paying salary and other incidental benefits till date”.

3. Heard Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-III for respondents and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner while working as Chief Executive Officer, he was placed under suspension vide proceedings dated 26.2.2022 by the then President, but however, the respondents have not reviewed the suspension order as required under law. Therefore, petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to direct the respondents to review the suspension order in terms of G.O.Ms.No.86, General Administration (Services-C) Department dated 8.3.1994.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents will review the suspension Order, in accordance with law.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to review the suspension order of the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.86, General Administration (Services-C) Department dated 8.3.1994 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate a copy thereof for the petitioner.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________ PULLA KARTHIK, J Date: 8.1.2026.

Note:

Issue C.C. in one week.

(b/o)

DA