SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2081

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Cheemala Pushpa – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 6519/2024



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.6519 of 2024 Date: 06.01.2026 Between:

Cheemala Pushpa ..Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and two others ..Respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not considering Dharani application bearing No.2200146981, dated 25.11.2022 made by the petitioner to issue e-pattadar passbook in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.4.05 guntas in Sy.No.185/ఉ situated at Maddulapalli Village, Kamepalli Mandal, Khammam District, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefs.

2. Heard Ms.Sujatha Kurapati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents and with their consent, this Writ Petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the aforesaid agricultural land having acquired the same through simple gift deed, dated 12.05.1985 executed by her father at the time of her marriage and since then she is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that since the name of the petitioner is not incorporated in Dharani portal and not issued the pattadar passbook, she made online application No.2200146981, dated 25.11.2022 for passbook data correction. The grievance of the petitioner is that, even after receipt of the said application, the respondents did not consider the same.

4. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disputed the submission of the online application and it is stated that if the application submitted by the petitioner fulfils all the requirements under law, the respondent authorities will consider the same.

5. In view of the above submissions, this Court, without going into merits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent authorities to conduct enquiry on the petitioner’s application vide application No.2200146981, dated 25.11.2022 by issuing notice to all the stakeholders including respondent No.3 and after affording them an opportunity of hearing and if the petitioner satisfied all the requirements under the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 consider the same and pass a reasoned order strictly in accordance with law and communicate a copy of the said order to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. Since the notice is stated to be ordered to respondent No.3, issuance of further notice to respondent No.3 in this writ petition shall stand dispensed with.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

_____________________

E.V.VENUGOPAL, J

06.01.2026 gkv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top