SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 58281

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Jatoth Vijaya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 40413/2025



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

WRIT PETITION No.40413 of 2025

Dated: 31.12.2025

Between:

Smt. Jatoth Vijaya.

… Petitioner

And

The State of Telangana,

Represented by its Principal Secretary and four others

… Respondents

:ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of

Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“… to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in

nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of

Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the representations

of the petitioner dt.24.10.2025 and 18.10.2025 and not

conducting enquiry regarding the registration and mutation

held in favour of the 5th Respondent during the existence of

the family settlement deed executed in favour of the petitioner

by the 5th respondent dt.14.11.2023 in respect of Agricultural

Land to an extent of 0.20 gts in Sy.No.345/1 situated at

Komatipally Village of Ingurthy Mandal, Mahbubabad District

as illegal and arbitrary and also violative of the Fundamental

Rights as enshrined under the Constitution of India and

consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the

representations dt.24.10.2025 & 18.10.2025 forthwith by

conducting enquiry in the interest of justice and to pass other

order or orders …”

##PAGE2##

2

2. Heard Ms.Chenagoni Mounika, learned counsel

representing Mr.M.Kondala Rao, learned counsel for the

petitioner, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4

and learned counsel for respondent No.5. Perused the

record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that

the petitioner is none other than the sister of respondent

No.5. During the life time of their parents, their father

executed a gift deed in favour of the petitioner on

22.05.2009 bestowing her the property in Sy.No.423/c of

Komatipally Village, Inugurthy Mandal, Mahabubabad

District, as pasupu kumkuma. While their parents are

alive, respondent No.5 never objected to the gift deed

executed by their father. However, after the death of their

parents, respondent No.5 objected to the same and did not

permit the petitioner to get the said land mutated in her

favour. Thereafter, respondent No.5 and the petitioner

settled their disputes and respondent No.5 gave her land

admeasuring Ac.0.20 gts. in Sy.No.345/1 situated at

##PAGE3##

3

Komatipally Village, Ingurthy Mandal, in place of the land

which is gifted by her father. While so, respondent No.5

again tried to grab her property. Inspite of the

representations, dated 18.10.2025 and 24.10.2025

submitted by the petitioner to conduct enquiry and cancel

the registration and mutation which had taken place in

favour of respondent No.5, the respondents have not taken

any action. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents,

the present writ petition is filed and seeks to pass

appropriate orders.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Revenue would submit that the petitioner ought

to have filed F-line application as per the relevant provisions

of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land)

Act, 2025 (for short, “the Act, 2025”) by duly enclosing all

the necessary documents, instead of rushing to this Court

by filing the present writ petition and seeking the relief,

which is nothing but misconception. Hence, he seeks to

pass appropriate orders.

##PAGE4##

4

5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned

counsel and on perusal of the material available on record,

this Court, without making any observations on the merits

or demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to grant liberty

to the petitioner herein to file necessary application as per

the relevant provisions of the Act, 2025. Upon filing such

application, the official respondents are directed to act upon

the application submitted by the petitioner and pass

appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible within (90)

days from the date of filing such application, strictly in

accordance with law, by putting all the interested parties on

notice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top