SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 58331

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Somisetty Lakshmi Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Dadabathula Venkata Krishna – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6106 OF 2018 Date: 31.12.2025 Between:

Somisetty Lakshmi Narasimha Rao …Petitioner AND Dadabathula Venkata Krishna and Other …Respondents

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the docket order dated 16.08.2018 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sathupally, Khammam District, in I.A.No.338 of 2018 in I.A.No.672 of 2015 in O.S.No.121 of 2014, whereby the learned trial Judge directed the Advocate Commissioner, who was earlier appointed in I.A.No.672 of 2015, to ascertain the warrant schedule land as per the report filed by the Mandal Surveyor, Aswaraopeta, and to submit a report.

2. Heard Sri V. Aditya, learned counsel representing Sri M.M.M.

Srinivas Rao, learned counsel on record for the petitioner, and Smt. K. Hima Bindu, learned counsel representing Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel on record for the respondents. It is submitted that earlier the petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No.672 of 2015 in O.S.No.121 of 2014 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sathupally, seeking appoi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top