IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Mr. KORRAPATI SUBBAIAH – Appellant
Versus
The Central Bureau of Investigation Through ACB Hyderabad – Respondent
CRLP 14937/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14937 of 2025
Date: 29.12.2025
Between:
Korrapati Subbaiah
… Petitioner/Accused No.1
And
The Central Bureau of Investigation,
Through ACB, Hyderabad,
Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
Hyderabad and another
... Respondents
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1
seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No.5914 of 2023 on the file
of XXI Additional Judicial Magistrate cum Special Court of
Sessions, Hyderabad, registered for the offence under Section 120-
B read with Sections 420, 464, 467, 468 and 471 IPC.
2. Heard Sri G.V.S. Nagesh, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri Srinivas Kapadia, learned Special Public
Prosecutor for CBI appearing for the respondent No.1.
##PAGE2##2
ETD,J
Crl.P. No.14937 of 2025
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
allegations made against the petitioner are utterly false and that the
petitioner is a civil contractor and has obtained loans from the
banks, after obtaining the legal opinion on the documents submitted
by him. Now, the de facto complainant cannot allege any fraud
against the petitioner. The Bank Authorities have properly evaluated
the documents and after obtaining the legal opinion from the panel
Advocates only, loan was sanctioned to the petitioner. Learned
counsel has further submitted that if all the documents are alleged
to be forged and fake, then the authorities involved in giving the
legal opinion and sanctioning the loan, also could have been
implicated in the case, but the Bank Officials are not included in
these proceedings, which itself shows the falsity in the allegations.
He further submitted that the documents were being sent by the
prosecuting agency to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory
(CFSL), wherein it was held that the questioned signatures are
tallied with the admitted signatures, thus the same disproved the
case of the prosecution and he further submitted that there is no
truth in the allegation that the petitioner has siphoned away huge
amounts, because no such amounts were diverted to his own
##PAGE3##3
ETD,J
Crl.P. No.14937 of 2025
account. He, therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings against
the petitioner.
4. Learned Special Standing Counsel for CBI has submitted
that each and every document produced before the Bank is a
forged document and that the prosecution could collect voluminous
documents in this case to prove the offence of forgery against the
petitioner herein. The CFSL report clearly reveals the element of
forgery and the act of forgery committed by the petitioner herein.
The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the
CFSL report disproves the case of the prosecution is not supported
by any material. He further submitted that, with the documents
collected by the prosecuting agency and with the material evidence
on record, the offences against the petitioner are bound to be
proved. He, therefore, prayed to dismiss the petition.
5. Perused the record.
6. The record discloses that the petitioner-accused No.1 has
availed credit facilities with Syndicate Bank, Chandanagar Branch
to an extent of Rs.10.00 crores against the primary and collateral
securities and accused No.4 stood as a guarantor and
subsequently, accused No.1 committed default in repayment of the
##PAGE4##4
ETD,J
Crl.P. No.14937 of 2025
loan and thus, the account was declared as NPA. On enquiry, it is
realized that the petitioner has submitted fake sub-contract
agreement, non-existent work orders in conspiracy with his vendors
accused Nos.12, 3 and 4 mortgaged the assets, which are non-
existent and further has siphoned off the borrowed funds which
resulted wrongful loss to the Bank to a tune of Rs.12.30 crores and
wrongful gain for themselves. In the vigilance investigation
conducted by the Bank, there were serious irregularities and lapses
committed by accused Nos.9 to 11 and further it is alleged that
accused No.2 submitt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.