##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF

TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

W.P.No.39783 of 2025

Date: 24.12.2025

Between:

Smt. S. Hanumakka

...petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

Revenue Department, Secretariat, Building, Secretariat,

Hyderabad and five others.

...respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the

respondent Nos.3 and 4 in not considering the petitioner’s

Sadabayanam by virtue of an unregistered transaction

sale deed dated 10-05-1987, application

No.ROS022003017383 dated 25-09-2025 and subsequent

written representation and sworn affidavit dated

03-11-2025 and 21-11-2025 before the respondent Nos.2

2 EVV,J

W.P.No.39783 of 2025

and 3 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the

respondent Nos.2 and 3 to pass appropriate orders for

carrying out the mutation of the petitioner’s name by

deleting the names of the respondent Nos.5 and 6 in all

land details on Bhu Bharathi Portal and for issuance of

new pattadar pass book and title deed in favour of the

petitioner.

2. Heard Sri S. Bhaskar, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the

respondent Nos.1 to 4. Perused the material available on

record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

that the petitioner has made the application dated

25-09-2025 and pursuant to this application, a notice

dated 25-09-2025 under Rule 6 (2) of the Telalngana Bhu

Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Rules, 2025, was

issued by the 2nd respondent stating the case of the

petitioner will be taken up for consideration and a date was

also fixed for conduction of enquiry on 31-10-2025, but so

3 EVV,J

W.P.No.39783 of 2025

far no action has been taken thereof. Aggrieved by the

same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for

Revenue, appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4, would

submit that necessary action would be taken in respect of

the application of the petitioner. He would further submit

that the petitioner has filed the suit in O.S.No.334 of 2022

on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gadwal Town

at Jogulamba Gadwal District, for perpetual injunction and

whereas, another suit was also filed by the respondent

Nos.5 and 6 against the petitioner in O.S.No.270 of 2019

dated 24-08-2020, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil

Judge at Gadwal, which was dismissed for having not-

pressed. However, the suit filed by the petitioner is still

pending for consideration and in that view of the matter, he

would submit that necessary enquiry would be conducted

on the application filed by the petitioner and appropriate

orders would be passed.

5. Having regard to the submissions of both the

learned counsel and upon considering the material

4 EVV,J

W.P.No.39783 of 2025

available on record, this Court without making any

observations on merits and demerits of the Writ Petition

deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition by

directing the respondent No.2 to examine the case of the

petitioner by issuing notices to the respondent Nos.5 and 6

and other necessary parties, after affording sufficient

opportunity, and thereafter, pass appropriate orders in

accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions

pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________

E.V.VENUGOPAL,J

Date: 24-12-2025

kvr