IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
PALWAI LAXMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TELANGANA – Respondent
WP 39457/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.39457 of 2025
DATE OF ORDER: 24.12.2025
Between:
Smt. Palwai Laxmi.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, Home Department and one other.
…Respondents
ORDER
Heard Sri.Harender Pershad, learned senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for
respondent Nos.1 and 2. With their consent this writ petition is taken up for
disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:-
“to direct the Respondents to consider the Complaint dated
21.11.2025 acknowledged as Petition
No.DGP/COORD/251125/09737 and the subsequent threats and
thereby provide adequate Police protection to the Petitioner and her
family members at Telangana State (Hyderabad, Hanamakonda and
Mahabubabad).”
3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are that petitioner is a resident of
H.No.2-10-635/1, Teachers Colony, Hanamkonda, Warangal District and
petitioner’s husband and son are practicing advocates in Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India, New Delhi and in view of their practice, petitioner and her
family members are staying in New Delhi and frequently visiting to Telangana
##PAGE2##2
State. It is submitted that petitioner’s family got threats which arise out of
petitioner’s son matrimonial dispute and a complaint dated 16.12.2025 was
also filed before the SHO, Defence Colony, Delhi. The case of the petitioner is
that on 21.11.2025 at about 3:24 PM, one Janga Raghava Reddy, believed to be
a rowdy sheeter, who is no way concerned to petitioner and her family
members, through Mobile No.9676809999, made a call to petitioner’s husband
and during telephonic conversation, the said person started abusing
petitioner’s husband and threatened that he would destroy and hurdle
petitioner’s husband and son. Hence, petitioner’s husband on 21.11.2025,
through E-mail, lodged a complaint and requested respondent No.2 to take
action against the said Janga Raghava Reddy. However, till date no action is
taken against the complaint dated 21.11.2025.
4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
the petitioner along with her family members are visiting Hyderabad,
Hanamakonda and Mahabubabad from 23.12.2025 to 04.01.2026 and since
there is imminent danger from Janga Raghava Reddy, learned senior counsel
would pray this Court to direct the respondent authorities to provide police
protection to the petitioner and her family members from 24.12.2025 to
04.01.2026.
5. Learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1
and 2 placed on record instructions issued by Commissioner of Police, Warangal,
wherein it is submitted that petitioner’s husband complaint dated 21.11.2025 was
forwarded to the Station House officer, Subedari Police Station, Warangal
##PAGE3##3
Commissionerate, for necessary action and report. On such complaint, GD entry
vide petition No.DGP/COORD/251125/09737 dated 04.12.2025, was made and
enquiry was conducted. During the course of enquiry, petitioner’s husband was
requested to produce evidence with regard to the threat calls, however, he did
not produced the same. It is further submitted that the enquiry officer had
obtained Call Data Record (CDR) of the alleged caller and it was revealed that
the petitioner’s husband on 21.11.2025, has called the alleged caller thrice i.e., at
15:18:32, 15:23:12 and 15:24:43 vide Tower ID No.404-49-31804-245903668. It was
further revealed that at the time of call, the petitioner’s husband was at Delhi and
the alleged caller was at Plot No.20, Sy.No.686, near Agricultural Market yard,
Jammikunta, Karimnagar District and both the areas did not falls under the
jurisdiction of Subedari Police Station, Hanumakonda Division, Warangal
Commissionerate.
6. Learned Government Pleader for Home submits that the petitioner’s
husband did not furnish any evidence to establish his grievance and moreover,
as per the enquiry, since 21.11.2025 to till date, the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.