IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Samudrala Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 39355/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.39355 OF 2025
DATE: 23-12-2025
Between:
Samudrala Bharathi .. Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration and Urban
Development Department,
Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad,
and three others. .. Respondents
ORDER: (ORAL)
This writ petition is filed to declare notice No.10880/W.No.114/
CIR-23/KZ/GHMC/2025 dated 05.12.2025 issued by respondent No.3
- Deputy Commissioner, Circle-23, Moosapet, under Section 461A of
the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short
‘GHMC Act’), to seal the unauthorized construction made by the
petitioner in her plot admeasuring 98.66 square yards situated at
KPHB Colony Ph-VII, Kukatpally, Moosapet Circle 23, Medchal-
Malkajgir District, without giving an opportunity to prefer the statutory
appeal as mandated under Section 461-A (2) (3) of the GHMC Act, as
being arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the
Constitution of India.
##PAGE2##::2::
2. Heard Mr. Dr. J. Viplav Babu, learned counsel for the
petitioner, and Mr. K. Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for
GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4, and perused the
material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that building
permission was granted to the petitioner for construction of stilt for
parking+2 upper floors vide permit No.323742/8785/GHMC/2023
dated 05.09.2023, as against that the petitioner constructed stilt+5
upper floors. One person of her locality by name Mr. P. Abilash
Reddy, having political clout, had been harassing the petitioner and
also he had been extorting money from several people of their
Colony. At his instance, the GHMC authorities issued the impugned
notice. Later, the petitioner came to know that show-cause notice
dated 14.07.2025 was issued and subsequently the speaking order
(demolition order) dated 31.07.2025 was passed. It is submitted that
the show-cause notice and the speaking order are not served on the
petitioner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4
produced written instructions along with building permit order dated
05.09.2023, show-cause notice dated 14.07.2025, speaking order
dated 31.07.2025 and also the photographs of the under construction
building of the petitioner.
##PAGE3##::3::
5. It appears, the show-cause notice dated 14.07.2025 was
issued to the petitioner directing her to explain as to why unauthorized
construction (deviations made to the sanctioned plan) shall not be
removed. Thereafter, the speaking order dated 31.07.2025 was
passed.
6. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC submitted that the
watchman of the petitioner has received the show-cause notice and
his mobile number was also noted on the show-cause notice.
However, there was no response from the petitioner and the speaking
order dated 31.07.2025 was passed.
7. In the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant any
relief to the petitioner as admittedly 3rd, 4th and 5th floors are
unauthorisedly constructed by the petitioner in the subject property.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that if
necessary, revised plan or regularization application will be submitted
by the petitioner under Section 455A/455AA of the GHMC Act.
Further, the petitioner is also taking steps to file statutory appeal
under Section 461-A (2) and (3) of the GHMC Act.
##PAGE4##::4::
9. However, as it is stated that the show-cause notice and the
speaking order are not served on the petitioner and, at the same time,
the petitioner is taking steps to prefer statutory appeal under Section
461-A (2) and (2) of the GHMC Act, the impugned notice dated
05.12.2025 is kept in abeyance for a period of one month.
Status quo, obtaining as on today, shall be maintained in respect of
the subject property for a period of one month from today. Within this
time, the petitioner shall take necessary steps for filing the revised
plan/building regularization application/appeal as provi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.