SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 58860

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Thattichettu Yadagiri Goud – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 4079/2025



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

WRIT PETITION No.4079 of 2025

Dated: 23.12.2025

Between:

Thattichettu Yadagiri Goud … Petitioner

And

The State of Telangana,

represented by its Principal Secretary,

Revenue Department and four others

… Respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution

of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“… to issue any order or direction writ or writs more

particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS

declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 sending a letter

No.B/2458/2024 Dt.07.12.2024 to the Respondent No.2

requesting to cancel NALA Proceedings No.200494406

Dt.08.08.2024 issued by the Respondent No.3 on the

representation of the Respondent No.5 and trying to cancel the

proceedings dt.08.08.2024 by the Respondent No.2, without

considering the representation dt.15.01.2025 is illegal,

arbitrary consequently to direct the Respondent No.2 not to

take any action basing on the letter sent by the Respondent

No.2 vide letter No.B/2458/2024 Dt.07.12.2024 without giving

any Notice to me and pass such other order or orders …”

2. Heard Mr.Yakaiah, learned counsel representing

Mr.D.Y.N.L.N.Charyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for

Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue

appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr.Chandrasekhar

##PAGE2##

2

Reddy Gopi Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Perused

the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent

No.3 had issued Nala Proceedings No.2400494406 dated

08.08.2024 by converting the agricultural land admeasuring

Acs.3.1800 gts into non-agricultural land out of total extent of

land admeasuring Acs.4.1200 gts in Sy.No.259A/1 situated at

Pedda Amberpet (Kalan) Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal,

Rangareddy District. Aggrieved thereby, unofficial respondent

No.5 has filed grievance application on 25.09.2024. Later,

respondent No.3 had addressed a letter No.B/2458/2024 dated

07.12.2024 to respondent No.2 seeking to issue necessary

instructions for cancellation of said Nala proceedings dated

08.08.2024, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, which

is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Therefore, he seeks to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the

lands for which the conversion permission has been granted

were already disposed of in favour of various persons and

suppressing the said facts the petitioner had obtained the Nala

proceedings dated 08.08.2024. Hence, respondent No.3 had

##PAGE3##

3

addressed a letter to respondent No.2 requesting not to entertain

any sale transactions in respect of lands admeasuring

Acs.3.1800 gts in Sy.No.259A/1 situated at Pedda Amberpet

(Kalan) Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District to

avoid multiplicity of litigations.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

contends that the case of the petitioner is under consideration

before respondent No.2 and the petitioner ought to have filed his

objections if any, before respondent No.2. Instead, petitioner

rushed to this Court a premature stage. Therefore, he states that

the Writ Petition is misconceived and seeks to dismiss the Writ

Petition.

6. Having regard to the submissions of all the learned counsel

and on perusal of the material available on record, this Court

without making any observations on the merits or demerits of

the case, deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file his

objections if any before respondent No.2, within a week from the

date of receipt of a copy of the order. On filing such objections,

respondent No.2 is directed to consider the same and pass

appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, as

expeditiously as possible, by putting the interested parties on

##PAGE4##

4

notice and affording them sufficient opportunity of hearing. Till

filing of the objections, the parties to this Writ Petition are

directed to maintain status quo obtaining

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top