IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
B.Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 11287/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.11287 of 2025
THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2025
Between:
B.Bharathi.
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue (Stamps and Registration),
Secretariat, Hyderabad and (3) others.
…Respondents
ORDER:
Sri Rajagopallavan Tayi, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for
Revenue as well as Stamps and Registration appearing for the
respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the
action of respondent No.3 in refusing to receive, register and
release the sale deed dated 18.02.2025 in respect of the open plot
bearing No.60, admeasuring an extent of 500 Sq.yards (or 418.06
Sq.mtrs.) in Sy.No.323/6, situated at Tellapur Village and
##PAGE2##2
Municipality, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District
(for brevity, “subject property”), pending vide No.P.170/2025 and
passing the impugned refusal order dated 15.03.2025 vide Memo
No.108/2025, on the ground that the respondent No.4 executed a
cancellation deed in respect of the subject property vide
Doc.No.2177/2003 dated 05.03.2003, as illegal and arbitrary.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
respondent No.4-Society, without issuing any notice to the
petitioner, unilaterally cancelled the registered sale deed executed
in favour of the petitioner vide Document No.4703/1982 dated
08.11.1982 through Document No.2177/2003 dated 05.03.2003,
which is contrary to the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Thota Ganga Laxmi & another vs. Government of Andhra
Pradesh and others, (2010) 15 SCC 207. Further, in a similar case in
W.P.No.27962 of 2005 dated 03.03.2011, this Court set aside the
unilaterally executed cancellation deed and the same has attained
finality. In view of the same, learned counsel prayed to set aside
the cancellation deed dated 05.03.2003 and to direct the
respondent authorities to register the subject document presented
by the petitioner without reference to the refusal order dated
15.03.2025.
##PAGE3##3
4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader,
basing on the counter filed by the respondent No.3, submits that
at the time of registering the cancellation in 2003, there was no
prohibition under the Registration Act, 1908, or the Rules made
thereunder, which prevented the registering officers from
accepting such unilateral cancellation deeds. The legal position
changed only after the amendment of the Registration Rules by
insertion of Rule 26(k) vide notification dated 29.11.2006, issued
by the Commissioner and Inspector-General, Registration and
Stamps, Andhra Pradesh. Hence, the registration of the
cancellation deed in 2003 cannot be faulted as it was in
accordance with the then prevailing practice and law. Further,
the petitioner presented the sale deed for registration, citing the
1982 sale deed as his link document. However, since the said
deed stood cancelled through the cancellation deed, the
petitioner’s document could not be entertained and registration
was refused by order dated 15.03.2025. Also, the Sub-Registrar,
being a statutory authority, is bound to act in accordance with law
and the documents available on record and unless the
cancellation deed is annulled by a competent Court, the petitioner
cannot insist upon registration of his subsequent deed based on a
cancelled document.
##PAGE4##4
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, basing on the
counter filed by the respondent No.4, submits that the then
President of the respondent No.4-Society committed several
irregularities by making multiple transactions over the same land
and conducting real estate business under the guise of the Society
which finally led to multiplicity of litigations. As part of the said
irregularities, the then President of the Society, in order to sell the
subject land to third parties, executed a unilateral cancellation
deed dated 05.03.20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.