IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
KANDULA KOTAIAH – Appellant
Versus
BAMDI SATYAM AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
MACMA 1588/2012
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
MACMA.No.1588 of 2012
BETWEEN:
Kandula Kotaiah, S/o.Guravaiah,
Aged about 33 years,
Occ: Agriculture & Collie,
R/o. Patha Pinapaka Village,
Thallada Mandal, Khammam District.
... Petitioner/Appellant
AND
1. Bamdi Satyam, S/o.Venkatappaiah,
Occ: Driver of Tractor & Trailor bearing No.
AP 20-U-3469 & 3470, R/o. Thatipudi Village of
Wyra Mandal, Khamma District and Others.
...Respondents/Respondents
JUDGMENT
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
Motor Vehicles Act assailing the Award passed by the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge) at Khammam
in MVOP.No.212 of 2002 dated 02.06.2005.
2. Appellant is the petitioner, respondent Nos.1 to 4 are the
respondents in MVOP No.212 of 2002.
##PAGE2##2/8
BRMR, J
MACMA.No.1588 of 2012
3. Notices got issued to respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the Appeal
are served but none appeared.
4. Appeal against respondent No.3 is dismissed vide order
dated 16.12.2011.
5.1. Appellant-petitioner has filed claim petition under Section
166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of
Rs.1,00,000/-with costs and interest @ 24% per annum from the
date of accident till the date of realization for the injuries sustained
by him in the accident.
5.2. On 03.06.2001 at about 6.00 p.m. the appellant-petitioner
was waiting for the Bus near Thatipudi Bus stop, at that time
respondent No.1 was driving the tractor and trailer bearing No.
AP-20-U-3469 and 3470 in a rash and negligent manner, came
with high speed and dashed the appellant-petitioner, due to the
impact the appellant-petitioner received fracture of right femur
bone and injuries all over the body and he was shifted to
Government Head Quarters Hospital, Khammam as inpatient for a
period of two months. During the course of treatment, major
surgeries were conducted, blood transfusion has taken place.
Plating was done due to the fractured femur bone and he was
treated by Dr. T.Madhan Singh, Orthopedic Surgeon, Government
##PAGE3##3/8
BRMR, J
MACMA.No.1588 of 2012
Head Quarters Hospital, Khammam. Appellant-petitioner was
discharged with an advice to take complete bed rest for six months
and was advised not to do any hard work for a period of one year
and he has spent Rs.10,000/- towards medical treatment.
Appellant-petitioner was a small agriculturist and was doing hard
work in the Fields and was aged about 30 years, earning
Rs.2,000/- per month and prayed to allow the O.P. against all the
respondents.
6. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 have filed their common counter
before the Tribunal and denied the allegations, the manner in
which the accident has taken place. Crime vehicle is insured with
respondent No.4 and they have to pay compensation if any and
prayed to dismiss the claim petition against them.
7. Respondent No.4 filed counter and contended that
respondent Nos.2 and 3 in collusion with the appellant-petitioner
with a view to cause loss to the Insurance Company has foisted a
false case and denied the manner in which the accident has taken
place, also denied the age and occupation, earning of the
appellant-petitioner.
##PAGE4##4/8
BRMR, J
MACMA.No.1588 of 2012
8. The learned Tribunal has framed the following issues:
1. Whether the accident took place due to rash and
negligent driving of the driver of vehicle?
2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to claim any
compensation, if so, to what amount and from which
of the respondents?
3. To what relief?
9. Appellant-petitioner is examined as PW.1 and also examined
PW.2-Dr. T.Madhan Singh, got marked Exs.A1 to A6. Respondent
Nos.1 to 4 did not choose to lead evidence. On behalf of
respondent No.4 Ex.B1-Insurance Policy is marked.
10. The learned trial Court after going through the evidence
adduced by the appellant-petitioner coupled with Exs.A1 to A6 and
Ex.B1 has awarded an amount of Rs.33,000/- with interest @ 9%
per annum from the date of petition till the date of realization
holding respondent Nos.1 to 4 are jointly and severally to pay the
amou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.