IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION No.21263 of 2024 DATED: 19^TH DECEMBER, 2025 Between Dr. M. Suresh Kumar DHMS and two others …Petitioners AND The State of Telangana rep. by DGP and three others …Respondents

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M. Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, submitted that the present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the registration of the FIR and that, subsequently, the Police have filed the charge sheet; therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, while praying to close this Writ Petition, he relied upon a decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in Pradnya Pranjal Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra and another¹ wherein it was held at Paragraph No.8 that:

“8. However, from the preamble of the writ petition filed by the petitioner before the Bombay High Court, it is evident that the same sought to invoke the twin jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the BNSS for having the FIR quashed. It is true that the police report (charge-sheet) had