SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 59510

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
K. Padmaja – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. 35842 OF 2025

18.12.2025 Between:

K. Padmaja .. Petitioner And Union of India, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Indian Railways, New Delhi & another ..Respondents

O R D E R:

Petitioner challenges the order dated 14.11.2025 of the 2nd respondent, whereby her licence was terminated and fresh tenders were called for through Notification dated –Nil- relating to the contract for operation and maintenance of Pay and Use Toilets at KSR Bengaluru City Railway Station. She asserts that the impugned termination order was issued without issuing any show cause notice and without complying with the order dated 06.11.2025 of this Court in Writ Petition No.33477 of 2025.

2. The case of petitioner is that disputes arose between herself and the 2nd respondent with regard to excess collection of licence fee in earlier quarters and the consequent refundable amount payable to her. Despite repeated representations requesting the 2nd respondent to calculate the refundable amount and adjust the same towards subsequent licence fee, the 2nd respondent insisted upon payment of the full l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top