IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.2183 OF 2019 DATE :16.12.2025 Between:

K.L.V.S. Lakshmi …Petitioner AND The State of Telangana & 6 Others …Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of the Respondent Nos.4 and 7 in colluding with Respondent Nos.5 and 6 and not taking any action on the FIR No 655/2018 U/s 341 354 406 420 468 506 120B IPC R/w 156 IPC registered on a complaint given by the Petitioner and complaint dated 03.02.2019 against the Respondent Nos.5 and 6 and his agents thereby aiding in demolition of the play school of the Petitioner as Arbitrary Illegal and in violation of Articles 14 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to direct any other official of the same Rank to conduct investigation on the complaints of the petitioner and provide necessary protection to the Petitioner School and to pass.......”

2. Heard Mr. G. Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as the respondent police authorities failed to take action against the unofficial respondents despite registration of FIR No.655 of 2018, wherein respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and their agents allegedly demolished the petitioner’s play school, the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, during the pendency of this petition, Crime No.655 of 2018 was duly investigated, and a final report was filed on 29.01.2022 before the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, classifying the matter as “civil in nature” before the learned Magistrate. In view of these developments, it is submitted that the contentions raised by the petitioner no longer survive for consideration, and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police authorities have failed to take action against the unofficial respondents pursuant to the crime registered against them. However, the record discloses that, upon due investigation, the police have filed a final report classifying the matter as civil in nature, and the crime proceedings have since been closed. In such circumstances, nothing further remains for adjudication in this writ petition.

7. Nevertheless, the rights of the petitioner are reserved to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law before the competent Magistrate’s Court, if any cause of action still survives. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date: 16-12-2025 hk