IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Karthik Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
The Government of India – Respondent
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD.
****
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.35686 of 2025 DATE: 11.12.2025 Between :
Karthik Krishnan … Petitioner Versus The Government of India, rep. by its Secretary, Company and Consumer Affairs, New Delhi and another …Respondents Sri A. Jagan, learned counsel representing Sri N. Indrasena Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri B. Ravindra Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2/Bank.
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
1. The writ petitioner claims to be a tenant of Flat No.302, Rukmini Enclave, M.J. Colony, Moulali, Hyderabad (secured asset) and seeks protection from this Court to remain in possession of the said secured asset for the next two months.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner underwent several difficult circumstances, due to which the petitioner failed to vacate the premises. Counsel further submits that the petitioner filed a Securitisation Application (S.A.No.512 of 2025) as well as an I.A., before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Hyderabad, and the same are pending, but that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.