IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Chakrapani – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Vuddagiri Sunitha Kusuma Kumari – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2844 of 2024
05th DECEMBER, 2025 Between:
Mr. Chakrapani, Hyderabad.
…Petitioner AND Mrs. Vuddagiri Sunitha Kusuma Kumari, Hyderabad.
…Respondent
ORDER
Heard Sri. Sankalp Pissay, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Sri. Hirendernath, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.
2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed preferred aggrieved by the order dated 01.08.2024 in I.A. No. 258 of 2024 in O.S. No. 3088 of 2022 on the file of learned X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short, ‘the Trial Court’), wherein, the petition filed under Order VII Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to receive certain documents to be marked as Exhibits, has been allowed.
3. The single grievance of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is that receipt of certified copy of cross examination of P.W.1 in O.S. No. 597 of 2020 dated 29.07.2022. It is argued that the said document cannot be received in evidence as the same does not meet the requirements under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (presen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.