SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 61215

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Chakrapani – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Vuddagiri Sunitha Kusuma Kumari – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2844 of 2024

05th DECEMBER, 2025 Between:

Mr. Chakrapani, Hyderabad.

…Petitioner AND Mrs. Vuddagiri Sunitha Kusuma Kumari, Hyderabad.

…Respondent

ORDER

Heard Sri. Sankalp Pissay, learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Sri. Hirendernath, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed preferred aggrieved by the order dated 01.08.2024 in I.A. No. 258 of 2024 in O.S. No. 3088 of 2022 on the file of learned X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short, ‘the Trial Court’), wherein, the petition filed under Order VII Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to receive certain documents to be marked as Exhibits, has been allowed.

3. The single grievance of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is that receipt of certified copy of cross examination of P.W.1 in O.S. No. 597 of 2020 dated 29.07.2022. It is argued that the said document cannot be received in evidence as the same does not meet the requirements under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (presen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top