SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 62153

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Sabhavath Beelya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 14624/2023



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.14624 of 2023 DATE OF ORDER: 01.12.2025 Between:

Sabhavath Beelya ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and four others ...Respondents

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of respondents in deleting the name of the petitioner pertaining to the land in Survey No.40/A admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0-32 guntas situated at Maktha Venkatapur Village, Kulkacharla Mandal, Vikarabad District and in mutating the name of respondent No.5, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondents to delete the name of respondent No.5 pertaining to aforesaid extent of land and mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records and to issue e-passbook. 2. Heard Mr. Rama Kotaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed that though various grounds are raised in the writ petition by the petitioner expressing his grievance to mutate the petitioner’s name in the aforesaid extent of land, learned counsel for the petitioner sought liberty of this Court to file an online application under relevant provisions of Bhu Bharati Act, 2025 in order to seek redressal for his grievance.

4. This Court having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, without making any observations on merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to grant liberty to the petitioner as sought for, to take necessary steps in accordance with law by filing an online application. 5. Granting liberty, as prayed for, by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed.

_____________________

E.V.VENUGOPAL, J

Date: 01.12.2025

Nsk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top