SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 62368

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
K. Naga Shilpa – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ibrahim Ali – Respondent
CRP 4314/2025



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA Civil Revision Petition No.4314 of 2025

28th November, 2025 Between:

K. Naga Shilpa … Petitioner AND Mohd. Ibrahim Ali and others …Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Sri N. Abhishek, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner- plaintiff has filed O.S.No.69 of 2021 against the respondents-defendants seeking specific performance of agreement of sale dated 16.08.2020 and the same was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 18.09.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner filed E.P.No.176 of 2024 for execution of the decree and the said E.P. was allowed vide order dated 01.07.2025. Currently, there is a need to execute the registered sale deed through Court process and the said process is still pending. Learned counsel further submitted that without disposing the E.P. within six months, as directed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi”1, learned Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family has been granting adjournments on the ground of taking further steps. Learned Judge vide docket order dated 17.09.2025, directed the office to verify and put up the draft sale deed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledged that the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court is burdened with heavy pendency of matters, and therefore, there is certain delay, but pressed for early disposal of the E.P., in view of the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi”2., wherein, it was held as follows:

“42. All Courts dealing with suits and execution proceedings shall mandatorily follow the below-mentioned directions:

14. The Executing Court must dispose of the Executive Proceedings within six months from the date of filing, which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay”.

3. In the circumstances stated above, learned Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court, at Medchal-Malkajgiri, is directed to dispose of E.P.No.176 of 2024, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

1 Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and Ors.

Manu/SC/0333/2021

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand closed.

___________________ RENUKA YARA, J Date: 28.11.2025 aks/rkk THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA C.R.P. No.4314 of 2025 Date: 28.11.2025 aks

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top