SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 62903

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Shriram Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kastri Krishna – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA Civil Revision Petition Nos.5027 & 5037 of 2018

COMMON ORDER :

The present Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioners under article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the orders, dated 12.06.2018, passed in I.A.Nos.1242 & 1243 of 2016 in O.S.No.1458 of 2010 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar.

2. Heard Mr.V.Venkata Mayur, learned counsel for the petitioners /

plaintiffs and Mr.Rakesh Sanghi, learned counsel for respondents/defendants.

3. The petitioners/plaintiffs filed the suit vide O.S.No.1458 of 2010 seeking perpetual injunction against the respondents/defendants. The defendants therein contested the suit and filed their written statement. The matter was posted for evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs on 17.11.2015 and on the said date, the plaintiffs could not appear and the suit was dismissed for default. Being aggrieved by the same, an interlocutory application was filed vide I.A.No.1242 of 2016 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying the court to condone the delay of 366 days in filing the petition under Order IX Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure along with another

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top