SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 63169

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
THOMAS JOHN – Appellant
Versus
PETER DIAS – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.12 of 2019

JUDGMENT:

1. This memorandum of appeal is filed under Section 96 of CPC assailing the order passed in I.A.No.23 of 2017 in O.S.No.146 of 1999 dated 17.07.2018 by XII Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court at Secunderabad.

2. Appellant is the respondent – defendant and respondent is the petitioner – plaintiff in I.A.No.23 of 2017 in O.S.NO.146 of

1999.

3.1 Respondent – petitioner has filed I.A.No.23 of 2017 in O.S.NO.146 of 1999 under Order XX Rule 12 read with Section 151 of CPC praying the Court to appoint an advocate commissioner to ascertain the quantum of rents prevailing in the plaint schedule vicinity and pass such other order as the Court may deem fit and proper. The schedule of the property is ground floor premises bearing plot No.68 admeasuring plinth area of 1510 sq.ft., in a building known as ‘Marliz’ situated at Paiga Colony SP road Secunderabad, with specific boundaries.

3.2 It is stated in the affidavit in I.A.No.23 of 2017 that the learned III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court Secunderabad was pleased to decreed the suit in O.S.No.146 of 1999 on 06.06.2005 and had directed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top