IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Anil Kumar Jukanti, J
Kandukuri Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.3861 OF 2013
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek compensation and employment for minors' deaths due to alleged departmental negligence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. state liability established based on absence of safety measures and failure to monitor project area. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court denies job assistance but mandates compensation to victims' families after deducting prior payments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
“… to issue an order or direction more
particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
a) Direct the respondent No.1 to 10 to pay
the exgratia amount/compensation amount
of Rs.2,00,000/- to each of the dependent
family in lieu of the untimely death of their
minor sons by name Kandukuri Venkatesh,
Kandukuri Venu and Ravula Narasimha
Rao all aged 8 years at the time of death on
23.01.2011 at Kinnerasani Project (L.F.
Head Sluices), Paloncha due to the gross
negligence of the respondents
b) To direct the respondents to provide Luskar
job to each of the dependent family besides.
c) Directing the respondents to initiate case,
against the erring employees of Kinnerasani
Project (L.F. Head Sluices), Paloncha who
were responsible for the the untimely death
of the above minor children, under the
provisions of Indian Penal Code and pass
such other order or orders as this Hon’ble
Court may deem fit and proper in the
circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard Mr. S. Madan Mohan Rao, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Assistant Government for Revenue for respondent Nos.1, 2, 8 and 9, learned Assistant Government Pleader for I&CAD, for respondent Nos.4 to 7, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondent Nos.3 and 10.
3. The case of petitioners is that one child of each of the petitioners, aged around eight (8) years, who were students, three of them, died on 23.01.2011 in Kinnerasani Project.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that children of petitioners went to hear the sluices at Kinnerasani Project at Paloncha, while they were looking at the unprotected sluices, all of a sudden, all the three children slipped from the sluices and fell inside the Kinnerasani Project. As they did not know swimming, all the three children died.
5. It is submitted that gross negligence of respondent Nos.1 to 9 led to the accident. That the Minister of State of Andhra Pradesh visited the spot along with other villagers. It is further submitted that Minister discussed the issue with the Irrigation Department officials and respondent Nos.1 to 10 announced an ex-gratia of Rs.2,00,000/- to each of the deceased families and one job of luskur post to each dependent family, and also promised to initiate criminal action against the respondent authorities. It is also submitted that notices were issued to respondent authorities, which were served on respondent Nos.5 to 9, but there was no response.
6. It is submitted that petitioners approached the Chairman, Legal Services Authority, Kothagudem, seeking a direction to respondent Nos.5 to 9 for passing an award for payment of ex-gratia amount of Rs.2,00,000/- and one luskur post to each of the deceased family members. That though notices were issued, when the matter was listed before the Legal Services Authority, the respondent authorities failed to fulfill the promises. It is pointed out that on 22.09.2012, the Mandal Legal Services Authority closed the petition granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the proper forum.
7. It is the case of petitioners that State Government is vicariously liable for gross negligence of authorities and having promised to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as ex-gratia besides one luskur post to each of the dependant families, yet the respondent authorities failed to take action. Hence, writ petition.
8. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1, 2, 8 and 9 submitted that under ‘Apathbandu Scheme 2013-14’, an amount of Rs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.