2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 63285
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Smt. D. Sushma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 35527/2025
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.35527 of 2025
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent No.4 in not taking action on the petitioner’s complaint submitted through mee-seva portal dated 01.07.2025 with regard to missing of original registered sale deed bearing document No.5852 of 1996 and original GPA document bearing No.258/1994, registered at S.R.O Nizamabad and not registering FIR and not issuing the non-traceable certificate as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to register FIR on the petitioner’s compliant dated 01.07.2025 and issue non-traceable certificate in relation to Missing/Lost document.
3. Brief facts as stated in this writ petition are that on 05.06.2025, while moving on bike from Sri Nagar Colony to Pulang, petitioner lost his bag which contains original registered sale deed bearing document No.5852 of 1996 and original GPA document bearing No.258/1994, registered at S.R.O vide Nizamabad. Thereafter, through Meeseva application No.1520010725190724335 dated 01.07.2025, petitioner made a complaint reporting missing document/title deed. The case of the petitioner is that till date respondent authorities did not initiate any action on the petitioner’s complaint dated 01.07.2025. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 fairly submits that if the petitioner approach the respondent authorities and submit the representation enclosing relevant documents, the respondent authorities would receive the same and would take appropriate action in accordance with law.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner pray this Court to grant liberty to petitioner to submit the representation enclosing relevant documents, before the respondent authorities and further pray this Court to direct the respondent authorities to consider the same and take action in a time bound period.
6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader did not dispute the same and pray this Court to pass appropriate orders.
7. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to petitioner to submit the representation enclosing relevant documents, before the respondent authorities and thereafter, the respondent authorities are directed to consider the same and take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.
8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
_________________________________ JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 24.11.2025
SU