SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 63349

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
B. SANJAY – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL DIRECTOR – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL Nos.32 and 33 of 2014

COMMON JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri Y. Sreenivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Anil Prasad Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for Directorate of Enforcement for respondent. Perused the entire record.

2. These Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals are preferred by the appellants aggrieved by the common order dated 20.08.2014 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, 15th Floor, Hindustan Times House, K.G. Marg, New Delhi, (‘Appellate Tribunal’), in Appeal Nos.132 and 133 of 2011, wherein applications filed by the appellants seeking stay of the common adjudicating order dated 13.10.2011 in Order No.SDE/SKS/VI/9/2011 passed by the Special Director of Enforcement, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India, New Delhi, (‘Adjudicating Authority’), were disposed of.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad Zonal Office, lodged a complaint under Section 16 (3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) against both the appellants herein for contravention of provisions of the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top