Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
The chief General Manager – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Ankit Packaging limited – Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. 36841 OF 2024
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent - Vidyut Ombudsman in Appeal No. 28 of 2023-24, dated 23.10.2023.
2. The case of petitioners – TGSPDCL is that the 1st respondent is a HT Consumer vide HT SC No. MDK 558 (SGR 558); power supply was released on 28.01.1993 and it was disconnected on 30.12.2009 due to non-payment of Current Consumption Charges. Subsequently, the 1st respondent sought restoration of power supply under Sick Industries Revival Scheme. In that regard, petitioners and the 1st respondent entered into a separate HT Agreement on 10.05.2010 and power supply was restored on 11.05.2010 under the provisions of Sick Industries Revival Scheme. As the 1st respondent has once again defaulted in payment of C.C. Charges, power supply was disconnected by p
The Ombudsman exceeded jurisdiction by preventing surcharge collection as per regulatory provisions, affirming that tariffs under the Electricity Act must be adhered to.
Consumers are liable to pay electricity dues as per the provisions of the Electricity Act, and the authority to recover such dues is upheld by the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article