SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 63478

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
Sri V.K.Ramdas – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Malini Vijay Kumar – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3805 OF 2025

ORDER

1. The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed assailing the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “the Trial Court”) in I.A.No.415 of 2023 in O.S. No. 658 of 2016. 2. By the impugned docket order, the Trial Court allowed the petition filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking permission to record her evidence as PW.1 through online mode by using video-conference facilities and, for that purpose, to appoint an Advocate Commissioner.

3. The Trial Court accordingly allowed the application and appointed an Advocate Commissioner to record the evidence of PW.1, directing that the plaintiff shall pay the Commissioner’s fee. This order is now under challenge.

4. The objections raised by the petitioners/defendants are primarily that (i) the affidavit seeking permission to record the evidence of PW.1 online was sworn to by the counsel for the plaintiff, (ii) the request for recording evidence through online mode was not in accordance with the guidelines framed by the High Court, and (iii) the grounds for such request were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top