SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 63624

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
M/s SRL Builders and Developers – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 35305/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.35305 of 2025

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“… to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 3 & 4 to submit a detailed report before the 2nd respondent in accordance with Letter No.F1/1631/2025 dated 27.09.2025 in respect of the land in Sy.No.295 admeasuring Ac.4-00 guntas situated at Mallampet village, Dundigal, Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district and the land in Sy.No.297 admeasuring Ac.3-16 gts and Sy.No.81/2 admeasuring Ac.0-25 guntas situated at Bollaram village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District for determination of location of afore said survey numbers, before consideration of building application submitted by the respondent Nos.6 & 7 by the 5th respondent, and pass such other order or orders…

…to direct the respondents 3 & 4 to consider for submission of a detailed report before the 2nd respondent in accordance with Letter No.F1/1631/2025 dated 27.09.2025 in respect of the land in Sy.No.295 admeasuring Ac.4-00 guntas situated at Mallampet village, Dundigal, Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district and the land in Sy.No.297 admeasuring Ac.3-16 gts and Sy.No.81/2 admeasuring Ac.0-25 guntas situated at Bollaram village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, at the earliest, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders …

… to direct the respondent No.5 not to issue Building construction permissions in favour of the 6th & 7th respondents, pending finalisation of dispute as to the location of survey numbers i.e., the land in Sy.No.295 admeasuring Ac.4-00 guntas situated at Mallampet village, Dundigal, Gandimaisamma Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district and the land in Sy.No.297 admeasuring Ac.3-16 gts and Sy.No.81/2 admeasuring Ac.0-25 guntas situated at Bollaram village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders …”

16 gts and Sy.No. 81/2 admeasuring Ac. 0-25 guntas situated at Bollaram village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders …”

2. Heard Mr.A.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Ms.T.V.Sudha, learned counsel representing Mr.V.Narasimha Goud, learned standing counsel for H.M.D.A. appearing for respondent No.5. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are claiming the land admeasuring Acs.3.16 gts in Sy.No.297 and land admeasuring Ac.0.25 gts in Sy.No.81/2 situated at Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District and the unofficial respondent Nos.6 and 7 are claiming the very same land stating that their land was admeasuring Acs.4.14 gts in Sy.No.295 situated at Mallampet Village; that on the applications made by petitioner No.23/Inturi Ramesh and respondent No.6/V.Manohar Rao, The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records Sangareddy and the Inspector of Survey, Survey and Land Records, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, jointly conducted inspection and reported that Sy.Nos.81/2 & 297 of Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Sangareddy District and Sy.No.295 of Mallampet Village falls in the disputed land between two (2) districts i.e., Mallampet Gandimaisamma-Dundigal Mandal, Malkajgiri-Medchal District and Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal Sangareddy District; that respondent No.2 vide proceedings in Rc.No.F1/1631/2024, dated 27.09.2025 requested respondent Nos.3 and 4 to examine the issue and submit a detailed report in the matter. But no action has been taken so far.

4. He further contends that pending disputes as to the location of the afore sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top