SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 63852

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Khaja Azeemuddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 24709/2018



O R D E R:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-

“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not taking action on the F.I.R.No.587/2018 dt.05-07-2018 on the file of 4th respondent as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to investigate into the F.I.R.No.587/2018 dt.05-07-2018 on the file of 4th respondent by following the mandatory provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and to pass…”

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, based on the petitioner’s representation, Crime No. 587 of 2018 was duly investigated, and a final report was filed on 30.07.2018 before the Court of the XII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajendranagar, classifying the matter as civil in nature. Accordingly, it is submitted that the contention of the petitioner does not survive for consideration.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police authorities have failed to take appropriate action in Crime No. 587 of 2018. However, as reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, during the pendency of this petition, the respondent police authorities have duly investigated the matter and filed a final report before the learned Magistrate classifying the dispute as civil in nature. This development indicates that the respondent police authorities have acted upon the petitioner’s representation and have submitted their report before the competent Court.

7. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner stands effectively addressed, and nothing further remains for adjudication in this writ petition. However, reserving the petitioner’s liberty to avail appropriate remedies before the learned Magistrate, if any cause still survives, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

___________________

N.TUKARAMJI, J

4596

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top