THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.34060 of 2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents.

With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal.

2. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:

“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 issuing the notice to the petitioners under Section 91/160 Cr.P.C, dated 05.11.2025, in relation to the Crime No.416/2016 on the file of 5^th respondent and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, made in abuse of process of law and amounting to malicious prosecution and Consequently direct the official respondents Stay the operation of the impugned notice issued under Section 91/160 Cr.P.C dated 05.11.2025 and pass and to pass…”

3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the notice issued by the respondent No.5 dated 05.11.2025 under Section 91/160 Cr.P.C. calling them to produce documents even though a civil suit vide O.S. No.87 of 2015 is pending on the same subject matter between the petitioners and respondent No.7 on the file of Family Court- cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy for declaration of title. It is further submitted that the petitioners are bonafide purchasers of the agriculture land in Kandi village from one Prem Raj, who is absolute owner and pattadar of the land in Survey No.565/14 an extent of Ac.15.16 guntas, in Survey No.656/15 an extent of Ac.9.20 guntas and in Survey No.656/16 an extent of Ac.10.07 guntas totalling to an extent of Ac.35.03 guntas situated at Kandi village and mandal, Sangareddy District, he has sold away the entire land in favour of petitioners and others through registered sale deeds document Nos6049/2008 dated 01.05.2008, 6050/2008 dated 01.05.2008, 6051/2008 dated 01.05.2008 and 6052/2008 dated 01.05.2008. The petitioners have applied for mutation on 07.08.2012 and 09.08.2012 to the Tahsildar, Sangareddy Mandal to make entries in the revenue records. It is further submitted that one S.Syam Prasad has created absolute agreement of sale on 09.03.1994 entered with one Premraj who is petitioners vendor also which was unregistered on Rs.50/- Non- Judicial stamp paper and approached the Tahsildar, Sangareddy Mandal and filed the application under Section 5(A) of ROR Act on 07.11.2005 to regularize the unregistered agreement and pending the same he approached this Court by filing W.P. No.27283 of 2005 and this Court passed order directing the Tahsildar to consider the application dated 07.11.2005 and pass appropriate orders. It is further submitted that he again approached this Court by filing W.P. No.5697 of 2007 seeking relief for presentation of the documents for registration, this Court directed the Sub-Registrar, Sangareddy to receive and process the same if not registered in view of that document cannot be registered, shall pass order and communicate the same to the petitioners, but the Sub-Registrar colluded with Syam Prasad and registered sale deed in favour of one N.Siddartha, Manne Subba Reddy/respondent No.7 and N. Venkatram Reddy vide Document Nos.12037/2007, 12036/2007 and 12035/2007 dated 31.05.2007. It is further submitted that said purchasers have approached Tahsildar, Kandi Mandal to implement the sale deeds by mutating their names in all the revenue records and the Tahsildar Kandi Mandal colluded with them and issued the proceeding Nos.B/18997/2014, B/18998/2014, B/18999/2014 dated 09.10.2014 without verifying the records. Then the legal entries was challenged before this Court by filing W.P. Nos.939, 9040 abd 9100 of 2017 with a request to suspend the impugned orders dated 09.10.2014 and this Court granted interim orders by suspending the same till today the interim order continuing vide order dated 15.03.2017. It is further submitted that petitioner No.2 and other