IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Puli Vajramma – Appellant
Versus
Nakirekanti Kishore – Respondent
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA C.R.P.No.1036 of 2024
ORDER:
1. Heard Mr. Kiran Palakurthi, learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff and Mr. N. Srinivas Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants.
2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda in I.A.No.34 of 2022 in O.S.No.220 of 2015, dated 19.06.2023, wherein, the said petition filed by the respondents herein under Order 26, Rule 9 r/w Section 151 of CPC seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was allowed by passing the following order:
“7. In the result, petition is allowed. Sri M. Kumar Reddy, Advocate is appointed as Advocate Commissioner to measure and find out that whether the suit schedule land is in Sy.No.126 or in Sy.No.139 of Vemulapally Village with the help competent surveyor i.e., Vemulapally Mandal Surveyor to note down the physical features of the suit schedule land and prepare a plan and file the same along with his report. The fee of Advocate commissioner is fixed at Rs.5,000/- and Commissioner is directed to file the report within 30 days from the date of this order.”
3. The brief facts of the case are t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.