SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 64167

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Sri. Kandinti Naika Beechupalle – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 34744/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.34744 of 2025

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not incorporating the petitioners’ name by making mutation in pursuance of petitioners’ succession application No.2500462008, dated 25.06.2025 in mutation / succession, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the petitioners’ application dated 25.06.2025.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the lifetime of petitioners’ father, the petitioners’ father was in possession of Ac.1-12 guntas and Ac.00-14 guntas in Survey Nos.79/C and Ac.100/C situated at Alwalpad Sivani and Village of Dharoor Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana State. After the demise of their father, they were in possession of the aforesaid lands being his legal heirs. It is further submitted that petitioners were all same family members and were residing in different places. After thorough examination and enquiry, the revenue authorities had issued Family Member Certificate in favor of the petitioners. Subsequent to the issuance of the said certificate, the 2nd petitioner applied for succession certificate to respondent No.3, for incorporating his name in all revenue records, to which the petitioner Nos.1 & 3 to 5 reported no objection. Due to inaction of respondent No.3 till date on his succession application, the petitioners are constrained to file this writ petition.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that the succession application of petitioner No.2 will be duly considered by verifying relevant documents and appropriate orders will be passed in due course of time on issuing notice to all concerned / interested parties strictly in accordance with law and seeks to pass appropriate directions.

5. This Court having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, without making any observations on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to direct respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner’s succession application and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law after issuing notices to all concerned /

interested parties.

6. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed.

____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J

Date: 17.11.2025

Nsk

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top