SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 64338

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
BOINI REKHA – Appellant
Versus
UPPARAPALLI AILAIAH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/appellant being aggrieved by the order passed in IA No.75 of 2017 in AS(SR) No.41 of 2017 on the file of the District Judge, Karimngar.

2. Heard Sri Bethi Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for the respondents.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner herein filed interlocutory application under order 41 Rule 3-A(1) of CPC for condonation delay of 989 days in preferring Appeal against the Judgment and Decree, dated 19.03.2014 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Siricilla in OS No.156 of 2013, however the trial Court dismissed the IA No.75 of 2017, vide order dated 28.07.2017 on the ground that no sufficient cause is shown by the petitioner herein to condone the said delay.

4. Being aggrieved by the dismissal order, dated 28.07.2017, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed contending that trial Court without considering the ill health of the petitioner and also that she was pursuing the remedy under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC the said delay was caused in filing the appeal. It is further contended that it is always desirable to decid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top