SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 64370

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Dr. Menchu Satya Rajashree – Appellant
Versus
Dr.Dantoori Pandu Goud – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA Tr.C.M.P.No.139 of 2025

ORDER:

Heard Sri S.Someshwar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.Sridhar Babu, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No.15 of 2025 pending on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bhongir, to the file of the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District.

3. The reasons cited for transfer are that the petitioner has two and half years old child and that she is a practicing Dentist and it would be difficult for her to travel from her house at Bandlaguda to the Court at Bhongir to defend the HMOP.

4. The respondent filed counter-affidavit and written arguments opposing the transfer on the ground that he is a practicing Doctor and his presence is essential in Bhongir as he is running a Diagnostic Centre. Further, it is pleaded that HMOP is a civil matter which is filed under the provisions of CPC, wherein the presence of the petitioner is not required on every date of hearing as against the cases pending before the Family Court under Section 30 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top