2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 64766
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Mr Mohammed Nasiruddin Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 22281/2024
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-
“… to issue a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein particularly respondent No.2 in not considering my representation dated 22-06-2024 for correction in Town Survey Land Register (TSLR) T.S.No.95 & 96, Block C, Ward 49 part and parcel of premises bearing Municipal No.5-3-945 to 5-3-958/A (proposed door No. 5-3-949/A & B), Municipal No.5-3-945 to 958/B (Proposed 5-3-950, 951, 953 & 955/A & B) and 5-3-945 to 958/C (proposed D.No.5-3-945, 946, 947, 952/A & B) to 951 and 5-3-953 & 955, Survey No.69/ Part (old), situated at Goshamahal, Mozamjahi Market Road, Nampally Village and Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana State as highly illegal arbitrary, violation of my fundamental rights, violation Article 14, 21, 300-A of The Constitution of India in consequence direct the respondent herein particularly respondent No.2 to carryout correction/purification of records in Town Survey Land Register (TSLR) in T.S 95 & 96, Block C, Ward: 49 part and parcel of premises bearing Municipal No.5-3-945 to 5-3-958/A (proposed door No.5-3-949/A & B), Municipal No.5-3-945 to 958/B (Proposed 5-3-950, 951, 953 & 955/A & B) and 5-3-945 to 958/C (proposed D.No. 5-3-945, 946, 947, 952/ A & B) to 951 and 5-3-953 & 955, Survey No.69/ Part (old), situated at Goshamahal, Mozamjahi Market Road, Nampally Village and Mandal, Hyderabad, Telangana State and pass such other order or orders …”
2. Heard Mr.Mir Mukkaram Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. Perused the record.
3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the representation dated 22.06.2024, respondent No.2 had issued proceedings No.Settl.II/2041333/2023, dated 29.03.2025. Therefore, he seeks liberty of this Court to take action in compliance to the proceedings issued by the said authority.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue takes no objection to the same.
5. Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel and on perusal of the proceedings No.Settl.II/2041333/2023, dated 29.03.2025, this Court does not see any reasons to keep this Writ Petition pending any further.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. The petitioner is granted liberty to work out the remedies as available under law. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J