IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Mathi Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 19330/2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in filing charge sheet in C.C.No. 223/2017 on the file of Junior Civil Judge-Cum-XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District without properly investigating into the matter by taking into the consideration of the FIR.Nos.406/2016, dated 11.12.2016 on the file of P.S., Bowenpalli and 662/2017, dated 24.11.2017 on the file of S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City, Krishna District registered against the 6th respondent is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 to the re-investigate into the matter in taking into the matter in taking into consideration of the FIR.Nos.406/2016, dt. 11.12.2016 on the file of P.S.,Bowenpalli and 662/2017, dt.24.11.2017 on the file of S.N.Puram police Station, Vijayawada City, Krishna District registered against the 6th respondent and to file Charge sheet afresh in C.C.No. 223/2017 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge- Cum-XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District, and pass…”
2. None for the petitioner.
Home appearing for respondents No.1 to 3.
C.C. No. 223 of 2017, on the file of the learned II Junior Civil Judge- cum-IX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal–
Malkajgiri, culminated in an acquittal by judgment dated 21.04.2025.
Hence, nothing further remains in this matter for consideration.
5. I have perused the material available on record.
6. The petitioner contends that the respondents/police authorities filed the charge sheet in the Calendar Case without conducting a proper investigation and seeks a direction for reinvestigation of the matter. However, the development reported by the respondents/police authorities shows that, after due trial, the case resulted in an acquittal. In view of this factual position, this Court is of the considered view that nothing further survives for deliberation in the present writ petition.
7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________ N.TUKARAMJI, J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.