SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 64838

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Mrs. Jameela – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 32611/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR W.P. No.32611 of 2025

ORDER

Questioning the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioner to the respondents No.3 and 4 Police Station under the guise of investigation even after submission of explanation to the notice issued under Section 353(6) of BNSS in Crime in FIR No.277 of 2025 dated 26.04.2025 and threatening with dire consequences of foisting false cases and continuing to call the petitioner frequently to the respondent No.4 Police Station, petitioner filed the present writ petition with a consequential prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 4 not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though explanation was submitted to the notice issued under Section 353(6) of BNSS in Crime in FIR No.277 of 2025 dated 26.04.2025, the respondents No.3 and 4 are continuously calling the petitioner to the Police Station and harassing mentally and threatening with dire consequences of foisting false cases. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents has placed a copy of the instructions dated 03.11.2025 of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Film Nagar Police Station, wherein it is stated that based on a complaint lodged by the husband of the petitioner, case has been registered as FIR No.277 of 2025 dated 26.04.2025 and during the course of investigation examined the complainant and recorded his statement and subsequently on 09.08.2025, respondent No.4 called the petitioner for the purpose of investigation and subsequently case has been transferred to the Tolichowki Police Station, on the point of jurisdiction vide No.1118/OW/FMNR-PS/2025 dated 21.10.2025. Except conducting investigation and transferring the case to the Tolichowki Police Station on the point of jurisdiction, the respondent No.4 neither interfered into the personal life and liberty of the petitioner nor threatened her in any manner.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their consent this writ petition is disposed of.

5. In that view of the matter, recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and since the case of the petitioner has already been transferred to the Tolichowki Police Station, House Officer, Tolichowki Police Station to follow due procedure as contemplated under law before initiating any action against the petitioner.

order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

________________________________

JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 11.11.2025 LSK

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top