SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 65192

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
D.Narasimha Goud – Appellant
Versus
Prathibha Shinde – Respondent


THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3654 OF 2025 Ms. Gundlapalli VSS Sruthi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

ORDER:

1. The Civil Revision Petition arises out of an order dated 29.08.2025 in I.A.No.189 of 2024 in O.S.No.1154 of 2016 passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, filed by the petitioner for demarking Ex.A5/ a Cash receipt, dated 16.12.2014. The petitioner herein is the sole defendant in the said Suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, seeking for recovery of possession.

2. By the impugned order, the Trial Court dismissed the said I.A. filed by the petitioner on the ground that the Cash Receipt, dated 16.12.2014/Ex.A5 was marked in the presence of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/defendant and that the counsel failed to take any objection of the marking of the said document at the relevant point of time. The Trial Court also held that the petitioner/defendant further confronted Ex.P5 to PW1 during cross- examination and had hence accepted the admissibility of the document in the course of Trial. The impugned order further records that the petitioner’s I.A. was filed only

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top